Rome, Aug. 17 (LaPresse) – “Before the Review Court,” Lavitola will make “further spontaneous statements, with a memorandum if he is allowed to submit it directly before the judges”. This was said by lawyer Arturo Cola, counsel for Valter Lavitola, outside Rome’s Rebibbia prison, where he is meeting with his client and taking stock ahead of the hearing before the Review Court. “We are here to determine whether it is necessary to supplement Dr. Lavitola’s statement ahead of the Review Court hearing. At that stage, it is possible to make spontaneous statements to clarify or provide an authentic interpretation of what has already been reported.” “The central points concern the manner in which the attack was carried out and the motive – the lawyer then clarified -. This is not about retracting anything, but about clarifying aspects that the judiciary considered imprecise, and at that stage it is possible to make spontaneous statements to clarify or provide an authentic interpretation of what has already been reported,” adding that “the central points concern the manner in which the attack was carried out and the motive. This is not about retracting anything, but about clarifying aspects that the judiciary considered imprecise.” “We are here to speak with Dr. Lavitola and determine whether it is necessary to supplement his statement ahead of the Review Court hearing. We already filed the appeal on Aug. 15, so, doing the math, the hearing should take place next week,” Cola concluded.
Ranucci attack, Lavitola’s lawyer: “He will make statements before the Review Court”
Rome, Aug. 17 (LaPresse) – “Before the Review Court,” Lavitola will make “further spontaneous statements, with a memorandum if he is allowed to submit it directly before the judges”. This was said by lawyer Arturo Cola, counsel for Valter Lavitola, outside Rome’s Rebibbia prison, where he is meeting with his client and taking stock ahead of the hearing before the Review Court. “We are here to determine whether it is necessary to supplement Dr. Lavitola’s statement ahead of the Review Court hearing. At that stage, it is possible to make spontaneous statements to clarify or provide an authentic interpretation of what has already been reported.” “The central points concern the manner in which the attack was carried out and the motive – the lawyer then clarified -. This is not about retracting anything, but about clarifying aspects that the judiciary considered imprecise, and at that stage it is possible to make spontaneous statements to clarify or provide an authentic interpretation of what has already been reported,” adding that “the central points concern the manner in which the attack was carried out and the motive. This is not about retracting anything, but about clarifying aspects that the judiciary considered imprecise.” “We are here to speak with Dr. Lavitola and determine whether it is necessary to supplement his statement ahead of the Review Court hearing. We already filed the appeal on Aug. 15, so, doing the math, the hearing should take place next week,” Cola concluded.