Rome, July 2 (LaPresse) – Meloni at the Quirinale? “Why not? She is a capable person. For us, as Futuro Nazionale and as Roberto Vannacci, it could be an option provided she revises some positions. I do not know how inclined I would be to vote for her if she does not push for preferential voting in the electoral law, or if she continues to follow the Draghi agenda, or if she supports this European Commission and the Green Deal. I like Meloni, I like the goals she set at the beginning of the legislature, but I believe a change of course is necessary. This talk about the Quirinale is proof of the old politics that thinks about power and positions. Instead of proposing the dream of a different country, one that returns to shining through its excellence, people are thinking about occupying the seats at the Quirinale, in the next legislature, and in state-controlled companies. We do not like this kind of politics. We should think about changing this country, putting ourselves at the service of citizens, restoring it to its former greatness. It almost seems that the order of priorities has been reversed. Positions and power will come afterwards.” This was stated by Roberto Vannacci, leader of Futuro Nazionale, on Radio Cusano during the program “Battitori Liberi”. “There is no taboo among citizens, but there is a taboo among many political forces about having a right-wing President of the Republic. I heard a representative of our left-wing parties angrily demanding an anti-fascism certificate for candidates considered for the Quirinale. This reveals an anti-democratic attitude, without taking into account that those who hold offices of that level swear allegiance to the Constitution and not to anti-fascism. I would say that other taboos must also be overcome. When people talk about the President of the Republic, attention is generally focused on those who have held ministerial or political office, whereas the Constitution says it can also be an ordinary citizen and that the choice can also fall on citizens who have distinguished themselves. I want to relaunch precisely this idea: instead of thinking about the usual names, why not think about other figures? I do not have a name, but I reserve the right to put one forward,” Vannacci continued.
Centre-right, Vannacci: “I would vote for Meloni for the Quirinale but a change of course is needed”
Rome, July 2 (LaPresse) – Meloni at the Quirinale? “Why not? She is a capable person. For us, as Futuro Nazionale and as Roberto Vannacci, it could be an option provided she revises some positions. I do not know how inclined I would be to vote for her if she does not push for preferential voting in the electoral law, or if she continues to follow the Draghi agenda, or if she supports this European Commission and the Green Deal. I like Meloni, I like the goals she set at the beginning of the legislature, but I believe a change of course is necessary. This talk about the Quirinale is proof of the old politics that thinks about power and positions. Instead of proposing the dream of a different country, one that returns to shining through its excellence, people are thinking about occupying the seats at the Quirinale, in the next legislature, and in state-controlled companies. We do not like this kind of politics. We should think about changing this country, putting ourselves at the service of citizens, restoring it to its former greatness. It almost seems that the order of priorities has been reversed. Positions and power will come afterwards.” This was stated by Roberto Vannacci, leader of Futuro Nazionale, on Radio Cusano during the program “Battitori Liberi”. “There is no taboo among citizens, but there is a taboo among many political forces about having a right-wing President of the Republic. I heard a representative of our left-wing parties angrily demanding an anti-fascism certificate for candidates considered for the Quirinale. This reveals an anti-democratic attitude, without taking into account that those who hold offices of that level swear allegiance to the Constitution and not to anti-fascism. I would say that other taboos must also be overcome. When people talk about the President of the Republic, attention is generally focused on those who have held ministerial or political office, whereas the Constitution says it can also be an ordinary citizen and that the choice can also fall on citizens who have distinguished themselves. I want to relaunch precisely this idea: instead of thinking about the usual names, why not think about other figures? I do not have a name, but I reserve the right to put one forward,” Vannacci continued.
